I know I read your paper in class, but I still wanted to read over it again - I think the link for your paper isn't working or something, because it keeps showing me an error message. However, I'll do my best on memory alone.
Project: To outline the political life and controversy surrounding Sarah Palin, particularly touching on the issues brought up with the release of her book.
Keywords/Quotes: All of the quotes you chose were very pertinent and introduced in a manner that didn't disrupt from your voice. (I would provide you with keywords, but I can't really remember, sorry!)
Strengths: Your final few paragraphs are particularly strong - you bring what seems to be a trivial issue into the spotlight and highlight it with topics such as literacy, culture, intellectualism - basically, the state of America. I found that to be the most impressive aspect of your paper.
Weaknesses: I don't believe there were really exactly any weaknesses, since the way I remember it seemed as though you had covered both sides of the controversy, and provided plenty of background info for the reader to have an opinion by the end of the paper, too.
I know I read your paper in class, but I still wanted to read over it again - I think the link for your paper isn't working or something, because it keeps showing me an error message. However, I'll do my best on memory alone.
ReplyDeleteProject: To outline the political life and controversy surrounding Sarah Palin, particularly touching on the issues brought up with the release of her book.
Keywords/Quotes: All of the quotes you chose were very pertinent and introduced in a manner that didn't disrupt from your voice. (I would provide you with keywords, but I can't really remember, sorry!)
Strengths: Your final few paragraphs are particularly strong - you bring what seems to be a trivial issue into the spotlight and highlight it with topics such as literacy, culture, intellectualism - basically, the state of America. I found that to be the most impressive aspect of your paper.
Weaknesses: I don't believe there were really exactly any weaknesses, since the way I remember it seemed as though you had covered both sides of the controversy, and provided plenty of background info for the reader to have an opinion by the end of the paper, too.